The 54 blogSport

by Andy

Solidarity Mechanism and training rights: funding grassroots clubs without breaching FIFA rules

The neighbourhood clubs and academies that develop stars get paid late and through layers of paperwork when those players are transferred in Europe. Here is how tokenisation turns training rights under FIFA regulation into immediate liquidity for the grassroots game.

World football carries a historic asymmetry: thousands of training clubs invest years and resources developing talent between the ages of 12 and 23, yet only see an economic return when that player features in a multi-million international transfer.

Under FIFA's Solidarity Mechanism, 5% of every international transfer fee is distributed proportionally among the clubs where the player was trained. The problem is financial: the right is a valuable but illiquid asset, subject to long administrative timelines and hard to monetise in advance.

The regulatory frame: what can be tokenised and what FIFA forbids

FIFA strictly prohibits third-party ownership of players' economic rights (TPO/TPI) in order to keep outside interests away from transfer decisions. There are, however, certain accrued contractual flows — or participations in the club's institutional income arising from already-established regulatory mechanisms — that can be structured lawfully without touching the club's sporting independence.

South American cases such as WIN Investments, and pioneering experiences at Brazilian clubs like Vasco da Gama in its day, showed the scale of market appetite for connecting supporters' savings with the development of the youth ranks.

How it is structured properly with Studio 54

Chat with an adviser on WhatsApp →

Read nextTokenise a real-world asset →

Keep reading

← All notes